A look at the benefits and drawbacks of different approaches to implant attachments.
Implant-supported overdentures are a life-changing option for many fully or partially edentulous patients. Attaching dentures to an osseointegrated dental implant enhances stability for the restoration, which allows for better function and increased confidence that the dentures will stay where they’re supposed to whether the wearer is talking, chewing, or doing anything else.
When it comes to affixing the dentures to implants, there are numerous approaches to choose from. The clinical situation and the patient’s anatomy inform the choice, but an in-depth knowledge of attachments allows the technician to select the best option for the case at hand and design the restoration to meet the case’s functional and esthetic requirements.
With this in mind, here are some pros and cons for 5 different styles of attachment.
The “most-fixed” type of fixed removable, this involves designing a restoration that will be attached directly to implant abutments with screws.
Pros:
Cons:
These attachments are versatile and feature a male ball usually attached to an implant bar or directly to implant abutments. The restoration locks onto the balls with integrated o-ring female attachments.
Pros:
Cons:
Similar to a ball attachment, these features a low-profile, cylindrical male component and a cap style female that clips the restoration to the attachments.
Pros:
Cons:
This attachment style features an implant bar that is affixed to the implants with screws, and then the dentures contain a channel that fits around the bar with plastic or metal clips in the channel to provide retention
Pros:
Cons:
These attachments feature magnets that are attached to the implant abutment or screw-retained bar, as well as corresponding magnets that are attached to the denture.
Pros:
Cons: